<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design/architecture critics needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/</link>
	<description>Vancouver city life and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17495</link>
		<dc:creator>Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17495</guid>
		<description>Where are all the architecture gurus on Frances blog hiding? Or is too demeaning to comment on a mere &quot;temporary&quot; piece of junk? 
Don&#039;t tell me you liked the Canada Barn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all the architecture gurus on Frances blog hiding? Or is too demeaning to comment on a mere &#8220;temporary&#8221; piece of junk?<br />
Don&#8217;t tell me you liked the Canada Barn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archie's dad</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17441</link>
		<dc:creator>archie's dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17441</guid>
		<description>Halifax has Bubble&#039;s Palace. We have the Canada Pavilion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halifax has Bubble&#8217;s Palace. We have the Canada Pavilion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorin Tatomir</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17432</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorin Tatomir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17432</guid>
		<description>Can you hear the grass growing? Definitely, on this thread you can.

I strongly feel that the Canada Pavilion should have been designed as a permanent structure 
(I am talking about the present location) as part of the Games “legacy”,  instead of the  temporary one it is now, later on to be used as a prospective Community (day care/ activities) Centre of which the present area is lacking of.  

Having said that, the location of the Canada Pavilion troubles me a lot and this is why:

Forget the false impression of easy access, the closeness to the BC place, the proximity to the CBC or the “transportation Hub” rational behind it. As a tourist I would rather be where the rest of Vancouverites are, most of the day and night, which is not in the Georgia &amp; Beatty perimeter, for sure. 
Not after dark, no. 
I would rather be around the area surrounding the entertainment district, Stanley Park, English Bay, Granville, Davie, Robson and Denman streets. Canada Pavilion should have been the Lighthouse of Alexandria for these Games. Seen from far away instead of being constricted on an empty parking lot.

Even Vanier Park (I am thinking the usual Bard on the Beach site) with route provided along the seawall and a stone throw away to Granville Island could have been a better choice, of course with added sea ferry stops perhaps and a nice free “Robson Plaza to Vanier” Olympic shuttle over the Burrard Bridge for the duration of the Games. Close to amenities and natural views.  
Imagine showcasing Vancouver from the Canada Pavilion from that location, instead of showcasing Costco’s drive-in entrance. David Lam Park could have been another good location for the Pavilion. The Vancouver Convention Centre West Plaza could have been a better spot too!

As for the Pavilion itself, not much to say, a barn shaped, steel frame, two stories structure, that’s been professionally covered in LED light panels. Most successfully seen during the night when all the lights are on. Greatest competition architecturally however comes from just across the street, from the beautifully crafted AMEC building and its complimentary water fall feature and park, QET or from the not so far Public Library.

To me, the Pavilion does not shout Team CANADA (at least not before reading the marquee) the feel is that of a  VANOC merchandising dispatch centre wrapped in an appropriate coloured treatment.

Any Presentation center build in Vancouver in the past ten years that I know of, was more successfully designed. VANOC should have given Bob Rennie the job for this one.

There. My two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you hear the grass growing? Definitely, on this thread you can.</p>
<p>I strongly feel that the Canada Pavilion should have been designed as a permanent structure<br />
(I am talking about the present location) as part of the Games “legacy”,  instead of the  temporary one it is now, later on to be used as a prospective Community (day care/ activities) Centre of which the present area is lacking of.  </p>
<p>Having said that, the location of the Canada Pavilion troubles me a lot and this is why:</p>
<p>Forget the false impression of easy access, the closeness to the BC place, the proximity to the CBC or the “transportation Hub” rational behind it. As a tourist I would rather be where the rest of Vancouverites are, most of the day and night, which is not in the Georgia &amp; Beatty perimeter, for sure.<br />
Not after dark, no.<br />
I would rather be around the area surrounding the entertainment district, Stanley Park, English Bay, Granville, Davie, Robson and Denman streets. Canada Pavilion should have been the Lighthouse of Alexandria for these Games. Seen from far away instead of being constricted on an empty parking lot.</p>
<p>Even Vanier Park (I am thinking the usual Bard on the Beach site) with route provided along the seawall and a stone throw away to Granville Island could have been a better choice, of course with added sea ferry stops perhaps and a nice free “Robson Plaza to Vanier” Olympic shuttle over the Burrard Bridge for the duration of the Games. Close to amenities and natural views.<br />
Imagine showcasing Vancouver from the Canada Pavilion from that location, instead of showcasing Costco’s drive-in entrance. David Lam Park could have been another good location for the Pavilion. The Vancouver Convention Centre West Plaza could have been a better spot too!</p>
<p>As for the Pavilion itself, not much to say, a barn shaped, steel frame, two stories structure, that’s been professionally covered in LED light panels. Most successfully seen during the night when all the lights are on. Greatest competition architecturally however comes from just across the street, from the beautifully crafted AMEC building and its complimentary water fall feature and park, QET or from the not so far Public Library.</p>
<p>To me, the Pavilion does not shout Team CANADA (at least not before reading the marquee) the feel is that of a  VANOC merchandising dispatch centre wrapped in an appropriate coloured treatment.</p>
<p>Any Presentation center build in Vancouver in the past ten years that I know of, was more successfully designed. VANOC should have given Bob Rennie the job for this one.</p>
<p>There. My two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17429</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been accused of knowing anything about design or architecture, but looking at the picture in the Sun this morning it struck me that maybe was someone was cleverly paying homage to  Vancouver Specials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been accused of knowing anything about design or architecture, but looking at the picture in the Sun this morning it struck me that maybe was someone was cleverly paying homage to  Vancouver Specials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17419</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17419</guid>
		<description>Shed World - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wcw2G9BiRc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shed World &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wcw2G9BiRc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wcw2G9BiRc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spartikus</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17411</link>
		<dc:creator>spartikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17411</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the actual Canada pavilion? LOL...I thought it was going to be a cafeteria or beer garden.

I often ride by &lt;a href=&quot;http://alberta.ca/vancouver2010/alberta-house.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alberta House&lt;/a&gt;. Not that I would hold it up as an example of excellence, but there&#039;s obviously been more thought behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the actual Canada pavilion? LOL&#8230;I thought it was going to be a cafeteria or beer garden.</p>
<p>I often ride by <a href="http://alberta.ca/vancouver2010/alberta-house.htm" rel="nofollow">Alberta House</a>. Not that I would hold it up as an example of excellence, but there&#8217;s obviously been more thought behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Clean</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17410</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Clean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17410</guid>
		<description>FB you don&#039;t need Architects  to provide a critique of the BUTT ugly Pseudo-Pavillion. It has an visceral repulsiveness about it. That is all. 

(PS It reflects badly on Canada and Harper)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FB you don&#8217;t need Architects  to provide a critique of the BUTT ugly Pseudo-Pavillion. It has an visceral repulsiveness about it. That is all. </p>
<p>(PS It reflects badly on Canada and Harper)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanS</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17405</link>
		<dc:creator>IanS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17405</guid>
		<description>Seems functional at best.  

Perhaps the theory is that Vancouver itself is really &quot;representing&quot; Canada at the games and there is thus no need for a well done pavilion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems functional at best.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the theory is that Vancouver itself is really &#8220;representing&#8221; Canada at the games and there is thus no need for a well done pavilion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul C</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17398</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17398</guid>
		<description>The Canada Pavilion reflects the federal government - late, overpriced and boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canada Pavilion reflects the federal government &#8211; late, overpriced and boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glissando Remmy</title>
		<link>http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/designarchitecture-critics-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-17396</link>
		<dc:creator>Glissando Remmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francesbula.com/?p=2464#comment-17396</guid>
		<description>NINE,8,6,5,4,3,2,1...The Olympic Countdown Thought of the Day

“I think that VANOC people are back to the basics; praying for white snowflakes, holding hands and chanting... Snow on the Olympic alpine runs; Canadian snow on Canadian mountains.  Tourists on floating cruise ships. Do you believe? Do Be Do Be Do Be Do Be Daaaa...” 

After finding out Punxsutawney Phil’s weather prediction for Vancouver, Jacque Rogue replied “Someone gets me that opinionated, obnoxious rodent right now and make an example out of him, sorry, was my mike on? Make him an official mascot offer!  And Furlong, send me more helicopters to Cypress, could you do that for me?! Wait; add a dozen or so truckloads of snow to that too! Wait, I also want 1,000 snow machinists disguised as Ice Cream vendors on the runs, right now.  Then tell that Premier of yours Wolfgang Puck or what’s his name, to get in touch with me and Johnny, anything goes wrong... you are a stranger to me! One more thing, not for the life of me, can I look at those corrugated cardboard podiums of yours without dreaming of UPS. Better listen to Frank, Johnny, listen to Frank!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfY0ZCIwLcg 

And then there were eight... 

We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.

PS.
As for the Canada Pavilion, hmmm, ugly like hell. It’s like spending four grand on a fancy Armani suit and then show-up at the Party in checkered runners and a mystic scarf. It didn’t work for Paul McCartney and it won’t work for us either. Helloooo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NINE,8,6,5,4,3,2,1&#8230;The Olympic Countdown Thought of the Day</p>
<p>“I think that VANOC people are back to the basics; praying for white snowflakes, holding hands and chanting&#8230; Snow on the Olympic alpine runs; Canadian snow on Canadian mountains.  Tourists on floating cruise ships. Do you believe? Do Be Do Be Do Be Do Be Daaaa&#8230;” </p>
<p>After finding out Punxsutawney Phil’s weather prediction for Vancouver, Jacque Rogue replied “Someone gets me that opinionated, obnoxious rodent right now and make an example out of him, sorry, was my mike on? Make him an official mascot offer!  And Furlong, send me more helicopters to Cypress, could you do that for me?! Wait; add a dozen or so truckloads of snow to that too! Wait, I also want 1,000 snow machinists disguised as Ice Cream vendors on the runs, right now.  Then tell that Premier of yours Wolfgang Puck or what’s his name, to get in touch with me and Johnny, anything goes wrong&#8230; you are a stranger to me! One more thing, not for the life of me, can I look at those corrugated cardboard podiums of yours without dreaming of UPS. Better listen to Frank, Johnny, listen to Frank!”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfY0ZCIwLcg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfY0ZCIwLcg</a> </p>
<p>And then there were eight&#8230; </p>
<p>We live in Vancouver and this keeps us busy.</p>
<p>PS.<br />
As for the Canada Pavilion, hmmm, ugly like hell. It’s like spending four grand on a fancy Armani suit and then show-up at the Party in checkered runners and a mystic scarf. It didn’t work for Paul McCartney and it won’t work for us either. Helloooo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

