Comments on: Richard Peck appointed to investigate city leaks

By: Wagamuffin

Wagamuffin — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:32:18 +0000

One more prediction: Judy Rogers is going nowhere.

Quid pro quo, and all that…

By: Wagamuffin

Wagamuffin — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:30:05 +0000

Do you think it’s because they think the electorate might be unhappy to find out who purloined the documents?

Say it ain’t so!

By: Stevevbc

Stevevbc — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:35:39 +0000

Quite sad (but typical) to read the quotes in the Sun today from Stevenson and Chow that they were”pressured” into voting for the investigation.

Just what we need, City Councillors with no conviction.

By: A. G. Tsakumis

A. G. Tsakumis — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:43:53 +0000

Actually, the only member of council who knew Lo was fired was Sam.

I agree with David, I might have wanted to withhold severance in exchange for some perspective on why it was that the senior most responsible financial officer at City Hall had such reservations about such a “good deal”…

The leak has become a sidebar, frankly. Peck is an exceptional lawyer and is a good choice, but the real story lies in what Estelle Lo knew, and when, about a file that really was owned by someone else at the Hall.

I hope before Vision cans Judy rogers, that they get some answers. Her performance his been imperial rather than inspriring.

Not good.

By: George

George — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:28:21 +0000

This is rich, the outgoing Council who voted on the Millenium loan in secret and pretended not to know that Estelle Lo was against the idea and that she had been “resigned” now want to waste more taxpayer money on discovering who did the public a favor. Who is City Hall supposed to serve anyway? However, David Cadman also wants Estelle Lo scapegoated by having her severance withdrawn. Disgusting.